People take sports seriously, some people that is. Others write sports off as an epic waste of time and resources. Amid a failed economy, two foreign wars, and a bungled health care plan, I can understand their beef. However, sports provide us with an escape from this hellish reality. Furthermore, sports are a natural outlet for the aggressiveness of human nature. For those who write sports off as a waste of resources I ask: Would you rather all these sports fans take out their aggression in other ways? Imagine if the hundreds of thousands of sports fans that fill stadiums and arenas every week took out their natural aggression by fighting. I guarantee the world would be a much scarier place.
That said, the competitive nature of sports is what makes it so appealing. Unfortunately, in these days of million dollar salaries and half empty arenas some teams dominate the scene. No one wants to see their team end up losers, but inevitably this will happen sometimes. What strikes me is the gap between the best and the worst teams. This indicates the health of the league. If the gap is too wide, the outcomes of games becomes more predictable. The more predictable a league is the less fun it is to watch. Unfortunately, only one major American sports league passes this test. Any guesses? Here’s a clue: It involves large sweaty men colliding with each other regularly. Well, I guess that rules out baseball. Here’s the real clue: it involves ice. There we go, no confusion now, the only healthy American sports league is the National Hockey League. It’s a shame it’s the least popular of the four major sports. But hey, if we expand the group to five and add Major League Soccer, hockey’s not the least popular anymore. Unfortunately, the MLS isn’t quite there yet.
Here’s the skinny on the current state of competition in American sports. (I’m leaving out baseball because the season’s over, but take a look at those numbers and they prove my point.) The NFL has 32 teams with 15 of them having a winning record. The best team, Indianapolis, has a .933 winning percentage and the worst team, St. Louis, a mere .067. The NBA has 30 teams, 14 of which have winning records. The best team, the L.A. Lakers, have a winning percentage of .806 and the worst, New Jersey, a pathetic .065. This is an unbelievably large gap between the best and worst. Furthermore, most teams end up losers. Now to hockey. The NHL has 30 teams, 19 with winning records and an unbelievable 24 teams at .500 or above. However, comparing percentages between leagues is apples and oranges due to the NHL’s point system. Regardless, the worst team, Carolina, wins 25% of their games, a far cry from the 6% in the other two leagues. This competitiveness gives every NHL fan hope that their team will end up winners. In the big money leagues of football and basketball, fans of losing teams have very little chance of seeing their team rise up from the ashes. Occasionally, the surprise happens, just look at the Cincinnati Bengals. However, one could argue that their rise was inevitable. They have a talented roster and a great coach, what more do you need to succeed? To me the formula is clear, just add ice.